[OSM-talk] Routing across parks

[Dave F.]

On 10/03/2015 17:02, Mike N wrote:
> On 3/10/2015 12:56 PM, Volker Schmidt wrote:
>> If I understand correctly that you want routing to cross a park as long
>> as the way in and the way out are connected to the perimeter of the
>> park. This is only correct in parks where you are free to walk anywhere.
>> Most parks in continental Europe do not work this way. Typically, but
>> not always, you have to stay on the paths.
>>
>> To solve this, one needs possibly a new (?) tag for parks like
>> stay_on_path=yes|no
>
> I agree - there needs to be areas of general walk permission 
> established before a router can include that area.

The vast majority of parks are public access & should be assumed as 
such. Access restrictions should be tagged. Similar to roads/path etc.

Dave F.



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com