[OSM-talk] BBC License Violation?

[Robert Banick]

Agreed with all the above. No sense coming across very small in a disaster, but it is an opportunity to tell our "story". Whether the BBC bites or not is really out of our control. 



—
Sent from Mailbox

On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Pierre Béland <pierzenh at yahoo.fr> wrote:

> Harry could you assure that they interview KLL ? I agree with Simon. This would be the more beneficial for OSM.
> regard  
> Pierre 
>       De : Simon Poole <simon at poole.ch>
>  À : talk at openstreetmap.org 
>  Envoyé le : Vendredi 1 mai 2015 18h14
>  Objet : Re: [OSM-talk] BBC License Violation?
>    
> Correct link worked now.
> I'm not aware that anybody in the LWG has a BBC contact, but Harry Wood
> from the CWG (and HOT) should have one. 
> It is one of the cases were more benefit is likely to be had by getting
> the BBC to do a piece on OpenStreetMap, KLL and the volunteers that are
> supporting the aid efforts by remote mapping. Getting attribution in an
> article that will be somewhere in the archives tomorrow doesn't really
> help anybody, and will potentially just end in disagreement because the
> provience of the data is likely difficult to actually trace, better
> strategy to have BBC owe us one.
> Simon
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20150501/619e02a9/attachment.html>