[OSM-talk] [Tagging] [Wiki Talk] Why OSM and not another collaborative mapping service?
simon at poole.ch
Thu May 7 11:03:55 UTC 2015
I'm really not sure what this discussion is doing on tagging and have
redirected follow ups to talk (it has in the matter of a few mails
already gone substantially off-topic though).
The page in question is actually a fork of
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google_Map_Maker which was written as
a response to the introduction of MM.
I personally consider it dangerous to base such a comparison on anything
but general principles. On the one hand you are always in danger of
being out of date and at least in a legal grey zone if not already out
side of it, on the other hand it tends to degenerate in to
political/point of view material, are all commercial companies actually
evil as Xxzme version seems to imply?
Am 07.05.2015 um 03:59 schrieb jgpacker:
> I call people to review the wiki page Why OSM and not another collaborative
> mapping service?.
> It was written by a single user as a generic page to compare other
> collaborative mapping services to OSM.
> My issue with this page is that it's not generic at all.
> Am I the only one that thinks this?
> I didn't want to bother with this until it started being recommended
> elsewhere in the wiki as official.
> View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Wiki-Talk-Why-OSM-and-not-another-collaborative-mapping-service-tp5843604.html
> Sent from the Tagging mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the talk