[OSM-talk] Abandoned Rails

[Richard]

On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 08:38:08PM +0200, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 09/03/2015 02:25 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> > also there are good arguments why it shouldn't be secret who owns which
> > pieces of land
> 
> "shouldn't be secret" != "should be in OSM"

what should be in OSM where possible is pubilc/private land. This is 
in many countries relevant for path/track routing.

Parcel boundaries probably should be included at least for commercial 
use lands - it is good to know that a piece of land belongs to a company
spraying poison on their fields or to a mining company and may fly around 
your ears anytime.

Richard