[OSM-talk] THIS is the kind of enthusiasm some would reject

Mateusz Konieczny matkoniecz at gmail.com
Tue Sep 8 06:10:25 UTC 2015


On 7 Sep 2015 15:31:02 -0000
Russ Nelson <nelson at crynwr.com> wrote:

> We should map everything that doesn't move, and maybe a few things
> that do.

And completely destroyed railways are fitting neither category as
things that are not existing neither move nor do not move.

In addition - there are things that doesn't move and should not be
mapped. And I am not aware about any moving things that should be moved
(unless someone considers windmills, trees, aerialways etc to be
moving).



More information about the talk mailing list