[OSM-talk] THIS is the kind of enthusiasm some would reject
Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdreist at gmail.com
Tue Sep 15 09:30:06 UTC 2015
sent from a phone
> Am 15.09.2015 um 10:18 schrieb Lester Caine <lester at lsces.co.uk>:
>
> The crux of the problem here is 'end_date' and if it is to be supported
> or not. I'm perfectly happy that features which exist on the ground need
> to be documented, and even having removed the tracks, a rail bed is
> still a substantial structure which can be reused or robbed out.
thing is, a dismantled railway has no end_date, it only has a start_date and will continue to be a dismantled railway, till the end of time
Anyway, end_date is just as broken as disused=yes, abandoned=yes, ruins=yes or any other qualifier that says that something is not any more what the other tags say.
cheers
Martin
More information about the talk
mailing list