[OSM-talk] [Talk-us] Slack

[Dave F]

There's an irony in these latest communication channels (loomio?) being 
called 'collaborative'. The more that are used within OSM the more 
fractured the communication becomes.

It wouldn't be so bad if any conclusions were broadcast, but 
increasingly they're not.

IRC, due to its exclusiveness does nothing to promote a "community" 
which many wish to attain.

Dave F.

On 02/04/2016 00:21, Dave F wrote:
>
> On 30/03/2016 22:20, Ian Sergeant wrote:
>>
>> I've never seen it as a hotbed of uncountered policymaking.
>>
>
> This is another case which confirms my point: As there's no record, 
> unless you're on it 24/7, you'll have no idea what it's being used 
> for, or when.
>
> On a couple of occasions I've been told it was used to make decision 
> about OSM. They wanted to talk to 'like minded people', away from all 
> the 'noise'. (paraphrased)
>
> On a slight tangent, it's disappointing that the developers of the iD 
> editor are reluctant to discuss its tagging features on the tagging 
> forum.
>
> Dave F.
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus