[OSM-talk] Data Quality and Mapping for the renderer.

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

sent from a phone

> Il giorno 22 ago 2016, alle ore 13:40, Simon Poole <simon at poole.ch> ha scritto:
> 
> "notifications that data that may be erroneous" please, not "errors".
> The false positive rate of all such tool tends to rather high and
> believing that the tool is right without checking is a sure way to break
> a lot of data.


+1, I'd like to join this choir, please use qm tool output as indications where a new survey might be fruitful, not as a means to find places with likely errors which you "correct" by the aid of guesswork and aerial imagery, but where you don't know the current situation on the ground (and which will leave the radar of everybody, also the locals, after you have "corrected" it).

cheers,
Martin