[OSM-talk] Routing through access=delivery

[Gerd Petermann]

Hi Markus,

access=destination doesn't mean that residents cannot reach their home,
my understanding is that access=delivery means you have to deliver 
something to a location at that road to be allowed to use that road.
So it means access=no for anybody else, doesn't it ?
I am sure that some roads are only used for delivery, but
those should be highway=service roads, not residential.
Anyway, I'll try to find a set of rules to for mkgmap.
 
Gerd

________________________________________
Von: Markus Heidelberg <markus.heidelberg at web.de>
Gesendet: Dienstag, 16. Februar 2016 04:31
An: talk at openstreetmap.org
Cc: Gerd Petermann
Betreff: Re: [OSM-talk] Routing through access=delivery

Hi Gerd,

Am 15.02.16, 21:29:59 CET schrieb Gerd Petermann:
> Hi Markus,
>
> I agree that forestry should be handled like agricultural, I'll
> try to create a patch for that.

Thank you.

> Reg. delivery I am a bit unsure because it seems that this this
> value is very often used in invalid combinations, e.g.
> highway=residential + access=delivery
> without further access tags. In my eyes this tagging is wrong,
> and my quick check showed > 50%  of the access=delivery tag
> was wrong like that.
> I am not sure how to proceed here.

Wrong data is nothing new. Did you compare with highway=residential +
access=destination? There are way more streets tagged like this and this
access restriction is in use already. I checked with Overpass turbo
around Germany: 12000 vs. 300 ways.

Someone commented on https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/238113 that
OsmAnd interprets the delivery value.

Markus