[OSM-talk] Automated edits code of conduct

Hakuch hakuch at posteo.de
Sun Jul 10 21:51:13 UTC 2016


On 10.07.2016 23:26, √Čric Gillet wrote:
> If it were to, I think it should be put to an higher set of standards than
> the changeset it aims to direct. For example it could be audited with an
> RFC, then a vote, and finally being explicitely accepted by contributors.
> 
> What are your thoughts ?

+1, I always like to have more "stable" decisions in our processes
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0x3CBE432B.asc
Type: application/pgp-keys
Size: 3113 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20160710/675380d4/attachment.key>


More information about the talk mailing list