[OSM-talk] Automated edits code of conduct

[Matthijs Melissen]

On 11 July 2016 at 01:08, Frederik Ramm <frederik at remote.org> wrote:
> The automated edits code of conduct is there for a reason; had user
> Test360 complied with it, then his edit would likely not have been
> faulty

My main issue with the AEcoc is that it is nearly impossible to comply
with, especially the part that says that community consensus is
necessary (or rather, "said", because this requirement seems to have
been silently removed).

Could you point me to a single worldwide mechanical edit that
satisfies the AEcoc guidelines?

-- Matthijs