[OSM-talk] Automated edits code of conduct
gdt at ir.bbn.com
Mon Jul 11 13:02:24 UTC 2016
[replying to the thread in general]
I tend to be nervous about groups that are structurally like the DWG.
However, when I look at what they've done over the years I've been
involved, and the notion of the automated edits code, I have to say the
DWG has seemed 100% reasonable and if anything slightly too restrained.
So while it's always healthy to have a little dissent/discussion, I
don't think things are broken.
Discussing real cases isb likely more useful and constructive than
theory. So perhaps we can table the meta-discussion and bring up
specific issues where people think they have overstepped.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 180 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the talk