[OSM-talk] Osmose, duplicate housenumber

[Imre Samu]

>Osmose seems to follow the rule: One feature, one OSM element (or one
feature, one tag) and avoids duplicating data.

imho=yes

#1.
in Hungary - we don't have housenumber imports  ..  so all housenumber
collected by mappers.   And sometimes exist in the building - and most of
the times not.
And it is very hard to communicate that some shops allowed the
 "addr:housenumber"  - and others not.

imho :
- this rule  is not beginner friendly.


#2.
As I know, the iD Editor is not following this rule ..
And the "contact:housenumber"  is not used by projects ( = editors )
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/contact%3Ahousenumber#projects

Probably we need to add the  "addr:housenumber"  to the exception list [1]
because  this "practice is firmly established and unlikely to change. "
[1]  http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element


Imre


2016-06-01 10:16 GMT+02:00 althio <althio.forum at gmail.com>:

>
>
> Łukasz Stelmach
>
>>
>> Can you explain why Osmose (and does it matter at all) warns about
>> duplicate housnumber when a shop (node) with a set of addr:* tags is
>> created inside a building (area) that is also tagged with addr:*?
>
>
>
> Osmose seems to follow the rule: One feature, one OSM element (or one
> feature, one tag) and avoids duplicating data.
>
> The rationale is certainly close to:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/House_numbers/Bremen_Schema
>
> where you can use:
>  - addr:* tags for buildings or nodes on the street
>  - contact:* tags for contact information about a POI
>
> Best,
>
> -- althio
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20160601/d049964d/attachment-0001.html>