[OSM-talk] Failed water proposal reversal

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

2016-06-20 11:29 GMT+02:00 Tomas Straupis <tomasstraupis at gmail.com>:

>   My main point is that existing tagging (especially widely used one)
> should not be changed unless it gives some ontological benefit (new
> features/properties being added, features split etc.).
>


actually you do not have to change any existing tagging when you implement
the "new" water=* tags, both can coexist without problems. I do agree that
changing (i.e. removing of established tags) is not the right approach to
add more detail.

Cheers,
Martin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20160620/88e438c4/attachment.html>