[OSM-talk] Need to revert a bunch of changesets

[Warin]

On 6/26/2016 5:06 PM, Michael Reichert wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> Am 26.06.2016 um 06:10 schrieb Robert Helvie:
>> I don't know about any other edits the user has made, but the ones in the
>> Sejong area really should be reverted. It is a shame, because the other
>> data they add such as names and address info could be very useful. But
>> their copying of possibly unlicensed data without attribution puts
>> Openstreetmap in jeopardy.
> What's the nickname of the user you are complaining about?
> Which changesets of this user have been commented by you?

A link to a changeset would be good... for example (I am not certain this is one your are talking about)  http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39688528

>
> If you think that a revert is the best solution, you should avoid manual
> fixes. They generate conflicts during the reverts. I hope that your
> fixes do not contain "valueable" information (i.e. can be also reverted
> without loosing good information).
>
> If the user continues adding fictional data or copies from other sources
> without permission although you have wrote that to him twice or more
> often, you can ask DWG to block him temporarily.

data at osmfoundation.org IIRC.

> This will either stop
> him adding new data or – what I hope – read your comments and change his
> behaviour.
>
> Best regards
>
> Michael
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20160626/e338ba3a/attachment.html>