[OSM-talk] NASA sites

[Fabrizio Carrai]

Correct, without NASA in the name we miss the important relation with the
agency.



2016-06-27 13:29 GMT+02:00 Adam Schreiber <adam.schreiber a gmail.com>:

> NASA could be added to the operator tag.  That could cause some confusion
> with regard to JPL as it's operated by the California Institute of
> Technology for NASA.
>
> Cheers,
> Adam
> On Jun 27, 2016 07:05, "Fabrizio Carrai" <fabrizio.carrai a gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>> I was checking about the NASA sites and I found the "NASA" term was not
>> always presente in the name tag:
>>
>> "Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center", Houston [1]
>> "Kennedy Space Center" (See Note below)
>> "Jet Propulsion Laboratory" , Pasadena, California [2]
>>
>> The Goddard is an exception (IMHO correct and complete)
>>
>> "NASA Goddard Space Flight Center" [3]
>>
>> Note: The Kennedy Space Center limits are not defined, I don't know if
>> they can be.
>>
>> Sometime "NASA" is indicated as "operator". What do you think, should
>> NASA be added to all the names ?
>>
>> Thanks for your opinion.
>>
>> --
>> *FabC*
>>
>> *[1] **http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/29.5630/-95.0919
>> <http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/29.5630/-95.0919>*
>> *[2] http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/374485271
>> <http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/374485271>*
>> *[3] http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4237285
>> <http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4237285>*
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> talk mailing list
>> talk a openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>>
>>


-- 
*Fabrizio*
-------------- parte successiva --------------
Un allegato HTML è stato rimosso...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20160627/107e7c3e/attachment.html>