[OSM-talk] NASA sites

Warin 61sundowner at gmail.com
Mon Jun 27 22:14:54 UTC 2016


On 6/28/2016 1:52 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
> 2016-06-27 17:32 GMT+02:00 Ethan Nelson <ethan.nelson.osm at outlook.com 
> <mailto:ethan.nelson.osm at outlook.com>>:
>
>     I would agree with leaving NASA out of the name=* tag as we
>     similarly don't name Fort Meade as ''United States Army Fort
>     George G. Meade'' [0].
>
>     [0] http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/133445
>
>
>
> that's a lot of tags, but so far there's no way besides looking at 
> wikipedia to see that it's run by the army. I think you would improve 
> the tagging to add official_name="United States Army Fort George G. 
> Meade'' and operator=*
>

No.

Use the 'operator=' to add the NASA, US Army etc, the 'name=' should 
only be the name!

We don't use road names to include reference designations (e.g. 
Macquarie Drive B87 is 'name=Macquarie Drive' 'ref=B87' not 
'name=Macquarie Drive (B87)'  ... so we should not use names to include 
operators.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20160628/1a854942/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the talk mailing list