[OSM-talk] Lot's of locality names in an otherwise empty area
s.arcus at open-t.co.uk
Mon Nov 21 09:39:53 UTC 2016
On 21/11/16 08:36, Rory McCann wrote:
> Additionally, there might be nothing there *now*, but there might have
> been things there in the past, and the name as stuck around, as a
> locality. Just because a place is unpopulated doesn't mean the place
> doesn't have a name!
Well, looking at the map, it looks like each and every parcel of land
and section of field has a locality tag associated with it. Even
allowing for places which don't exist any more and other local/cultural
differences, it still seems a bit odd - and begs the question if those
tags really need to be there.
More information about the talk