[OSM-talk] Tagging and rendering of television masts

Oleksiy Muzalyev oleksiy.muzalyev at bluewin.ch
Sun Apr 23 09:01:40 UTC 2017

All what is written at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Aviation is 
fair enough, especially the main principle: "We map anything that is 
observable on the ground.", but not an airspace. A communication tower, 
or a mast is well observable on the ground.

The DJI changed the map on its RPAS control stations from Google to Here 
Map. And on Here Map not much is shown. So usually one looks at several 
maps while planning a flight, especially in an urban area.

Best regards,

On 23.04.17 10:47, Andreas Vilén wrote:
> Please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Aviation
> Pilots do not use the osm base map...
> /Andreas
> Skickat från min iPhone
> 23 apr. 2017 kl. 07:50 skrev Oleksiy Muzalyev 
> <oleksiy.muzalyev at bluewin.ch <mailto:oleksiy.muzalyev at bluewin.ch>>:
>> On 22.04.17 21:17, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>>> sent from a phone
>>>> On 22. Apr 2017, at 08:33, Oleksiy Muzalyev 
>>>> <oleksiy.muzalyev at bluewin.ch <mailto:oleksiy.muzalyev at bluewin.ch>> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>> In my opinion, it is a significant issue, in fact a disaster 
>>>> waiting to happen. There will be soon air-born taxi in Dubai, 
>>>> Singapore, etc., and the extremely high communication towers, the 
>>>> so-called aviation traffic obstacles 
>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_traffic_obstacle , are not 
>>>> rendered on the OSM map at all.
>>> which disaster do you expect to happen? Someone flying around in 
>>> dense fog and using no other information than osm-carto?
>>> I agree it is a shortcoming that towers are not rendered on 
>>> osm-carto, but we should keep calm and not exaggerate its significance.
>>> cheers,
>>> Martin
>> Dear Martin,
>> An air traffic obstacle, a tall structure which can endanger air 
>> traffic, has to be marked with red and white colored markings and 
>> with aircraft warning lights at night. If you look at these 
>> communication towers this is how they are actually painted.
>> An airman say a pilot of a medicopter may well study terrain 
>> carefully on a map before a flight. In fact it is not a flight as a 
>> bird flies, but rather a jump as there is a time limit, an endurance. 
>> That is why a planning is necessary.
>> Unfortunately on the OSM map he/she will not see any icon. At the 
>> same time the air-traffic in urban areas will continue to increase. 
>> It is future of urban mobility [1].
>> If a helicopter, an RPAS, a plane touches a mast or a cable it would 
>> crash; a mast may collapse. For individuals involved it could 
>> certainly be a disaster.
>> People do realize it. Andy not only mapped the communication tower 
>> (or mast) but plans to map its cables. It is a good idea too. It will 
>> take time to map all these towers (masts), measure and calculate 
>> their height, etc.
>> Unfortunately the confusion between "man_made=tower" and 
>> "man_made=mast" continues. One is rendered and one is not, and that 
>> adds to confusion.
>> [1] 
>> http://www.airbusgroup.com/int/en/news-media/corporate-magazine/Forum-88/My-Kind-Of-Flyover.html
>> With best regards,
>> Oleksiy
>> _______________________________________________
>> talk mailing list
>> talk at openstreetmap.org <mailto:talk at openstreetmap.org>
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20170423/817aa810/attachment.html>

More information about the talk mailing list