[OSM-talk] Standard map style contributions
Christoph Hormann
osm at imagico.de
Fri Dec 29 10:26:51 UTC 2017
On Friday 29 December 2017, Andy Townsend wrote:
> [...] As described in
> https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/blob/master/CARTO
>GRAPHY.md , OSM Carto has somewhat conflicting goals - both as "an
> important feedback mechanism for mappers" and as an "exemplar
> stylesheet".
Note the above document was originally written as the first part of a
longer document that ends with more specific guidelines that were meant
specifically to help contributors to recognize what kind of changes are
desirable and which are not. The maintainers could not agree on more
specific design principles though which ultimately left this in an
incomplete state that can be used to justify either accepting or
rejecting a very wide range of changes.
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/pull/2462
> With the last two issues it's difficult to know what to suggest -
> there has to be an overall style "direction" otherwise you just end
> up with something that is a bit of a mess. Likewise there have to be
> some standards, but sometimes I suspect that if the maintainers
> actually want to see a fix to a particular problem that they'll need
> help potential contributors a bit more.
Actually if there is a need of a shared, overall design direction has
been a subject of quite a bit of debate over the last 1-2 years - see
for example here:
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/2270
While i agree with you that from my perspective a style direction or
design paradigm is needed for successful development i try to be open
to the possibility that it is not. How to attract contributors in such
a framework is not something i can provide a competent opinion on
though.
--
Christoph Hormann
http://www.imagico.de/
More information about the talk
mailing list