[OSM-talk] Decline in accuracy of capture date metadata in Bing imagery

[James]

"Best is to only map areas that you visit and verify yourself"

And the email thread was hot osm webinar


On Jul 25, 2017 1:24 PM, "Christoph Hormann" <osm at imagico.de> wrote:

> On Tuesday 25 July 2017, James wrote:
> > Griping about it on the mailing list won't really solve anything.
>
> I just wanted to share the observation and maybe see if this is possibly
> something that varies regionally and others have a different experience
> with it.
>
> No big deal.
>
> > To paraphrase you from another email chain:
> > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Do_Not_Trace_from_O
> >utdated_Imagery
>
> Not sure what you want to say with that - both the link and the
> reference to 'another email chain'.
>
> --
> Christoph Hormann
> http://www.imagico.de/
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20170725/82a7fb72/attachment.html>