[OSM-talk] Decline in accuracy of capture date metadata in Bing imagery

Christoph Hormann osm at imagico.de
Tue Jul 25 18:41:55 UTC 2017


On Tuesday 25 July 2017, SwiftFast wrote:
>
> By the way, the following tool shows Bing dates or date ranges
> easily: http://mvexel.dev.openstreetmap.org/bing/

Good point, this way i can also show some examples:

http://mvexel.dev.openstreetmap.org/bingimageanalyzer/?lat=65.5539846374678&lon=-22.1823449592793&zoom=14
http://mvexel.dev.openstreetmap.org/bingimageanalyzer/?lat=46.46214743063528&lon=8.081674484851312&zoom=15
http://mvexel.dev.openstreetmap.org/bingimageanalyzer/?lat=46.49924729235581&lon=9.218649262604437&zoom=15
http://mvexel.dev.openstreetmap.org/bingimageanalyzer/?lat=47.787511410586184&lon=8.102959980612763&zoom=14
http://mvexel.dev.openstreetmap.org/bingimageanalyzer/?lat=42.70595957869988&lon=1.3594145728797358&zoom=16
http://mvexel.dev.openstreetmap.org/bingimageanalyzer/?lat=29.374688823225483&lon=96.21858894766497&zoom=15
http://mvexel.dev.openstreetmap.org/bingimageanalyzer/?lat=-9.801842449586673&lon=-77.24212156023569&zoom=16
http://mvexel.dev.openstreetmap.org/bingimageanalyzer/?lat=-13.927775274665677&lon=-70.96097724002455&zoom=16

There are also cases where the capture date changes without the image 
changing (not in an inconsistent way though i should emphasize):

http://mvexel.dev.openstreetmap.org/bingimageanalyzer/?lat=-46.68073208629639&lon=-73.87032059204124&zoom=14

-- 
Christoph Hormann
http://www.imagico.de/



More information about the talk mailing list