[OSM-talk] Decline in accuracy of capture date metadata in Bing imagery

Mark Wagner mark+osm at carnildo.com
Thu Jul 27 03:56:13 UTC 2017


On Tue, 25 Jul 2017 15:48:25 -0700
Clifford Snow <clifford at snowandsnow.us> wrote:

> I'm sure if we were paying for imagery we would
> have different requirements. Bing probably wants nice looking - with
> lots of green vegetation. Our needs would be better served by leaf
> off imagery.

It depends on what we're mapping.  An image with lots of green makes it
easy to tell an abandoned field from one that's growing wheat, and the
current Eastern Washington Bing imagery is quite good for judging the
extent of seasonal wetlands and ponds.

-- 
Mark



More information about the talk mailing list