[OSM-talk] OSM Note 1000000
Florian Lohoff
f at zz.de
Fri May 26 08:43:00 UTC 2017
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 09:17:50PM +0100, Dave F wrote:
> Yeah, but how many of them are useful? I spend far too much of my
> OSM time mopping up irrelevant, out of date & inaccurate info. Many
> notes are indicating locations which already exist such as building
> names & parks. What devices are being used which don't display this
> clearly?
So who is at fault? The one mentioning somethings missing - or the one
putting some information into the map without closing the note?
I am personally using the note for a lot of purposes, and i am very
thankful we have them.
I have an RSS Feed in my reader so i can react within 24 hours for my
area of interest ...
Flo
--
Florian Lohoff f at zz.de
UTF-8 Test: The 🐈 ran after a 🐁, but the 🐁 ran away
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 828 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20170526/5155a15d/attachment.sig>
More information about the talk
mailing list