[OSM-talk] Woods vs Forests

[Tomas Straupis]

> IMHO there are semantic implications in the key, as has been said many
> times, <...>

  And that is subjective -> nobody is wrong -> everybody is right ->
everybody thinks THEIR proposal is the right one -> this topic is not
settled for so many years -> I suggest doing a compromise and agreeing
on ONE tag.
  (Compromise is currently done on rendering/data extraction side.
Nobody cares there about natural/landuse/landcover whatever. It's one
forest and that is it)

  The only other way is to use de facto situation - natural=wood and
landuse=forest - and forget this discussion.

P.S. And all I wanted was to talk about topology rules... BTW: here is
an example of topology rules in Lithuania:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Lithuania/Topology_rules

-- 
Tomas