[OSM-talk] Woods vs Forests

[Lester Caine]

On 02/11/17 09:40, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> ONE tag to say what? You are still owing an answer to this.

I think the problem is similar to the multiple areas problem. There are
several layers of complexity so should landuse=residential enclose the
whole area including the grass and wooded areas or should they all be
isolated areas? Adding leisure=park within landuse=residential area just
makes things even more difficult? Just what is a small area of trees?
within the leisure=park or landuse=forest because it's not a
natural=wood 'creation' ... it's something the planning authorities have
requested as perhaps a barrier or simply as an amenity ... or has been
preserved as it has been there for hundreds of years ...

We need to build a proper hierarchy of LANDUSE into which more detail
can be added if required?

-- 
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-----------------------------
Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk
EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/
Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk
Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk