[OSM-talk] Hillshading on OSM maps

[joost schouppe]

On 3: I'm not sure I understand correctly, but I guess I would enjoy
correcting mountains like these:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/-15.0325/-68.6564&layers=C
<http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=14/-15.2443/-68.5648&layers=C>


2017-11-07 9:45 GMT+01:00 Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>:

>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> > On 7. Nov 2017, at 03:22, Daniel Koć <daniel at koć.pl> wrote:
> >
> > 3. What do you think about using OSM hillshading "fork" which could be
> editable somehow to follow OSM data (of course it doesn't belong to OSM
> database, since it's a raster data, not a vector one)?
>
>
> I’ve generally found very good correspondence between srtm and osm, in
> hilly areas the hillshading made the map much more readable, and especially
> the parts without trees growing on them made much more sense (as you could
> see that they were on the hilltops and oriented to the same direction).
>
> I can’t imagine editing height raster data based on osm though, how would
> you do it? This implies moving bits quite a lot probably, because you won’t
> even notice 5 or 10 meters in 30 or 90m grid data. I would expect global
> coverage 3D scan data to be more reliable than osm and would rather do the
> opposite (adjust osm to fit hillshading).
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>



-- 
Joost Schouppe
OpenStreetMap <http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/joost%20schouppe/> |
Twitter <https://twitter.com/joostjakob> | LinkedIn
<https://www.linkedin.com/pub/joost-schouppe/48/939/603> | Meetup
<http://www.meetup.com/OpenStreetMap-Belgium/members/97979802/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20171107/9130fc77/attachment.html>