[OSM-talk] New OSM Quick-Fix service
Rory McCann
rory at technomancy.org
Fri Nov 10 12:41:28 UTC 2017
If someone points out a problem, surely it's better for the
developer to think about whether they have a point, about whether your
software should act this way, rather than just saying "But JOSM does it!".
Do *you* think removing layer=0 is a good idea? What is the objection to
removing it?
Just because someone else does a bad thing doesn't mean you have to copy
them. Is your tool merely "JOSM validator, but with SPARQL and on the web"?
On 09/11/17 21:48, Yuri Astrakhan wrote:
> JB, the "layer=0 removal" is one of the JOSM validations - it
> automatically gets suggested to anyone editing an area with that object,
> with the "fix" button autofixing it. JOSM doesn't have a "mark this
> autofix as invalid" button, which means that even if you don't autofix
> it, the next person reviewing the same area may. This sounds identical
> to the issue raised by Simon above:
> > ...you don't actually "confirm" that something is a good edit or not.
> You only have the choice of making an edit or leaving it to others to
> do. ... This makes the whole thing entirely equivalent to a mechanical edit.
>
> So we should either A) remove it from JOSM, or B) define when it should
> be kept vs deleted, because otherwise we are not being consistent with
> requirements.
>
> In JOSM:
> https://josm.openstreetmap.de/browser/josm/trunk/data/validator/unnecessary.mapcss?rev=12999#L6
>
> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 5:56 AM, JB <jbosm at mailoo.org
> <mailto:jbosm at mailoo.org>> wrote:
>
> Le 08/11/2017 à 19:43, Yuri Astrakhan a écrit :
>
> removing layer=0
>
> Please don't. Once again, mapping is done by humans, and layer=0 IS
> sometimes useful to humans, even if computers don't need it.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org <mailto:talk at openstreetmap.org>
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
> <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
More information about the talk
mailing list