[OSM-talk] New OSM Quick-Fix service

Rory McCann rory at technomancy.org
Mon Nov 13 13:50:23 UTC 2017


On 13/11/17 01:16, Yuri Astrakhan wrote:
> if an accepted tool already does something in a certain way, and 
> noone is raising any objections to it, I think other software should 
> follow in the same foot steps.
 > ...
> I haven't heard anyone saying that JOSM validator autofixes do a bad 
> thing until this conversation. Do you think they are bad?

Yes, sometimes! I looked at your fixes, saw one that didn't make sense, 
(about unisex toilets) followed it to the JOSM validator, filed a bug 
which seems to be fixed ( https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/15536 ).

JOSM isn't perfect, "many eyes make all bugs shallow" etc.





More information about the talk mailing list