[OSM-talk] What would make MapRoulette better?

[Pierre Béland]

Martin,
Yes I suggest to add tags to the changeset metadata. On the HOT discussion list and the Github Tasking Manager project, you should find discussions about this. Yes, it is possible to send these tags with the remote control.
 
Pierre 
 

    Le lundi 20 novembre 2017 16:45:02 HNE, Martijn van Exel <m at rtijn.org> a écrit :  
 
 Hi Pierre,

That is a good idea and there are already some ‘hashtags’ that MapRoulette sends to JOSM. I don’t know if this is possible in iD as well. I think it is something that could be improved upon. Perhaps with changeset tags (is that what you are suggesting?)

Does anyone know if JOSM and / or iD support ‘sending’ changeset tags through remote control / the querystring?

Martijn

--  
Martijn van Exel

On November 20, 2017 at 2:00:36 PM, Pierre Béland (pierzenh at yahoo.fr) wrote:
> Hi Martijn
> We see an increase of coordinatead actions via QA and TM tools. But this is not systematically  
> documented on the Changeset metadata. For QA tools, sometimes we see in the comments  
> reference to MapRoulette or other tools.
> It is possible for these tools to transfer infos to editors such as iD and JOSM. It would  
> be good that tags are transferred to the editors to better document the coordinated actions.  
> For TM tools, it could be host and project_no / Title. For QA, it could be host and project.  
> For Maroulette this could beQA=MaprouleteProject=XXX where XXX corresponds to a particular  
> challenge.
>  
> Pierre
>  
>  
> Le lundi 20 novembre 2017 15:50:21 HNE, Martijn van Exel a écrit :
>  
> Marc,
>  
> Good point and something that has come up often.
> As Joost mentioned in a reply, the easy solution for this is, as a challenge owner, to split  
> up the challenge into regional chunks and label them as such.
>  
> The new version will have ‘filter by current map bounds’. I’m not quite sure how to best  
> do this yet. One solution would be to filter by challenge ‘centroids’ (simple), another  
> would be to consider whatever challenge has at least one task within the current map bounds  
> (harder). What would be your idea about this? Others with an opinion?
> --
> Martijn van Exel
>  
> On November 20, 2017 at 9:58:40 AM, Marc Gemis (marc.gemis at gmail.com) wrote:
> > The possibility to work more locally. E.g. there is a project to add
> > missing roads in Belgium, I would really like to see only the "issues"
> > within let say 20km of my house (an arbitrary point I can set).
> >
> > m.
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 9:59 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > For those who have used MapRoulette or at least have a good understanding of
> > > what it does: what would be the *one top thing* for you that would make it
> > > better?
> > >
> > > I am asking because I am working on a new major release.
> > > --
> > > Martijn van Exel
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > talk mailing list
> > > talk at openstreetmap.org
> > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
> > >
> >
>  
>  
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>  
  
-------------- section suivante --------------
Une pièce jointe HTML a été nettoyée...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20171120/0fa3cb30/attachment-0001.html>