[OSM-talk] What would make MapRoulette better?
Martijn van Exel
m at rtijn.org
Sat Nov 25 01:37:27 UTC 2017
I’d appreciate you back that statement up with some data that goes beyond some isolated examples, Dave.
> On Nov 24, 2017, at 2:18 PM, Dave F <davefoxfac63 at btinternet.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 24/11/2017 07:59, joost schouppe wrote:
>> For example, "Skipped" to me means "meh, didn't feel like doing this task".
>
> No! it's an option to ignore the task if the user doesn't think there's anything wrong. Maproulette is based on guesswork. A task doesn't mean there's an error that definitely needs fixing
>
> There appears to be a compulsion by users to complete tasks in Maproulette even when they have no *accurate* knowledge. This is wrong. It adds *erroneous* data to OSM.
>
> There's a clue to Maproulette's randomness & uncertainty in its name.
>
> I believe a good way to improve OSM data is to ban Maproulette.
>
> DaveF
>
>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
More information about the talk
mailing list