[OSM-talk] DWG survey on organised editing
Yves
yvecai at gmail.com
Wed Oct 18 10:31:10 UTC 2017
That's a good point, starting with an OSMF guideline, then after a while, a policy if needed.
Or do you mean a wiki community written guideline?
Yves
Le 18 octobre 2017 03:05:28 GMT+02:00, john whelan <jwhelan0112 at gmail.com> a écrit :
>Probably what we could do with is a set of guidelines for people
>organising
>mapping groups. This is not policy so much as best practices.
>
>Could this be done before we thrash out a policy?
>
>Thanks John
>
>On 17 Oct 2017 8:27 pm, "Frederik Ramm" <frederik at remote.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> the results are in!
>>
>> https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Data_Working_Group/
>> Results_of_Organised_Editing_Survey_2017
>>
>> Thank you everyone who participated.
>>
>> Bye
>> Frederik
>>
>> --
>> Frederik Ramm ## eMail frederik at remote.org ## N49°00'09"
>E008°23'33"
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> talk mailing list
>> talk at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20171018/b79e6c5c/attachment.html>
More information about the talk
mailing list