[OSM-talk] Name challenge - what to call the new OSM+Wikidata service?
Yuri Astrakhan
yuriastrakhan at gmail.com
Sun Sep 17 21:45:18 UTC 2017
One thing we should consider is the domain name. I doubt we can afford
woq.com :)
These names were proposed
woq 2
wdoqs
wdosm
woqs
q936
And these proposed names have OSM in them, so likely are not good according
to Legal
wosm 2
wikosm
wikidosm
On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 5:10 PM, Simon Poole <simon at poole.ch> wrote:
> I believe there is a slight misunderstanding, while remixing
> OpenStreetMap/OSM/etc in various ways may result in cutesy copycat domain
> names they simply do not jibe well with reality.
>
> Not only does every single one of them weaken the standing of the marks
> themselves and make is increasingly difficult to take action against
> misuse, they are further uncontrollable liabilities for the whole
> community. I gave the example of OpenWeatherMap, but there are others that
> would be really painful if they ended up in the hands of your fav giant
> tech corp.
>
> That said, I'm not sure why you believe the policy has broken something,
> with the exception of a few local chapters, to my knowledge, the OSMF has
> never granted a licence to anybody to use the marks in a domain name. As
> outlined in the FAQ we will be operating a grandfathering scheme to
> legalize such use after the fact so actually making such use legit for the
> first time.
>
> And yes: WoQ would be a wonderful name for Yuris service and shows that it
> is completely possible to break out of the old schema of simply copying OSM.
>
> Simon
>
> Am 17.09.2017 um 15:57 schrieb Yves:
>
> So, no OpenSparqlMap, then? :(
> Sad, this policy definitely broke something.
> Yves
>
> Le 17 septembre 2017 12:58:12 GMT+02:00, Blake Girardot
> <bgirardot at gmail.com> <bgirardot at gmail.com> a écrit :
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> How does this relate to the new draft trademark policy?
>>
>> I can't tell from the draft policy, but I believe that OSM at least is
>> a protected mark, not sure about osm.
>>
>> But I do think Simone Poole asked the community to stop naming things
>> with osm trademarks in them or variations on openstreetmap phrase.
>>
>> Cheers
>> blake
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 5:11 PM, Yuri Astrakhan <yuriastrakhan at gmail.com> <yuriastrakhan at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> The new service is getting more and more usage, but it lacks the most
>>> important thing - a good name. So far my two choices are:
>>>
>>> * wikosm
>>> * wikidosm
>>>
>>> Suggestions? Votes? The service combines Wikidata and OpenStreetMap
>>> databases, and uses SPARQL (query language) to search it, so might be good
>>> to reflect that in the name.
>>>
>>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Wikidata%2BOSM_SPARQL_query_service
>>>
>>> P.S. I know this is the hardest problem after off-by-one and caching...
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> talk mailing list
>>> talk at openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing listtalk at openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20170917/2e9b8376/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the talk
mailing list