[OSM-talk] Is it technically and legally possible to add the Open Location Code to the OSM search?
Andrew Hain
andrewhainosm at hotmail.co.uk
Sat Aug 11 10:23:52 UTC 2018
Do you know whether the latitude and longitude on the plaque are in the WGS84 that we use?
________________________________
From: Andrew Errington <erringtona at gmail.com>
Sent: 11 August 2018 10:56
To: mmd
Cc: Talk Openstreetmap
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Is it technically and legally possible to add the Open Location Code to the OSM search?
I tag survey points with latitude and longitude (taken from the plaque on the survey marker). Then it is possible to see if they have been moved accidentally, and for users to check that they are actually in the surveyed location.
Andrew
On Sat, Aug 11, 2018, 21:24 mmd <mmd.osm at gmail.com<mailto:mmd.osm at gmail.com>> wrote:
Am 10.08.2018 um 19:46 schrieb Christoph Hormann:
> The idea of tagging encoded coordinates is so ridiculous to anyone with
> a bit of understanding of computer programming, data processing and
> data maintainance that even after ignoring all the arguments in
> substance that have been voiced this should be universally rejected if
> for no other reason then because it would make OSM the laughing stock
> of the whole geodata world.
With all due respect, I think we've long crossed that point:
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/KSJ2%3Alat
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/ngbe%3Alat_ed50
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/gns%3ALAT
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/latitude
--
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk at openstreetmap.org<mailto:talk at openstreetmap.org>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20180811/065ea808/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the talk
mailing list