[OSM-talk] Ground truth for non-physical objects
colin.smale at xs4all.nl
Mon Dec 17 13:41:14 UTC 2018
On 2018-12-17 14:14, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> sent from a phone
>> On 17. Dec 2018, at 13:31, Tomas Straupis <tomasstraupis at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Especially interesting and useful would be stories of how maritime
>> boundaries or boundaries with no considerable obstructions built have
>> been actually mapped by physical observation.
> as these are claims you can't observe them, you have to rely on the baseline that the claiming country provides/defines and extend it by the buffer that is claimed.
Aren't these maritime boundaries deposited with the UN under UNCLOS?
Once that has been done, I would expect that it would be THAT version
that is most definitive, and no longer the drafts etc. made by the
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the talk