[OSM-talk] Mapping rivers that flow into/through lakes?
rory at technomancy.org
Fri Feb 23 14:36:53 UTC 2018
On 23/02/18 11:58, François Lacombe wrote:
> If some rivers/streams shouldn't be connected, then some data consumers
> will have to do an automatic connection anyway. When measuring water run
> off and pollution, you probably want to know that "stuff going into
> stream X will eventually get to point Y downstream" (right?).
> I don't get this, which situation do you think of when you say " If some
> rivers/streams shouldn't be connected " ?
If OSM takes a "all rivers must be connected through lakes", then data
consumers have a simple job. If OSM says "some will and some won't",
then data consumers have to process the data to add intra-lake
connections. If they have to do it some of the time, why bother
connecting *any* rivers?
I think I'll change to not connecting rivers, unless it's very obvious,
and leaving data consumers to connect rivers themselves.
More information about the talk