[OSM-talk] proposed mechanical edit - moving FIXME=* to fixme=*
Tom Pfeifer
t.pfeifer at computer.org
Tue Jul 3 12:27:11 UTC 2018
On 03.07.2018 14:21, Dave F wrote:
>> it should be updated when the object is touched individually anyway, thus not spoiling the history
>
> There's no difference doing it that way or with a bulk edit - it will still be recorded in the
> history..
It is a major difference! Doing the mechanical edit touches the last_edited for _all_ objects, as
pointed out by Michael, and makes an analysis for old objects significantly difficult. Doing it
individually _while doing other edits on the object_ touches the history for an intended improvement
of content, not some unimportant lowercasing.
> Removes duplicated, reduces confusion, easier to search.
Cannot confirm any of those from my perspective.
Age of the object is much more difficult to search, while ignoring the upper/lowercase is easy.
> A good Spring clean improves the database.
Spring is over, however the database is improved all seasons by individual edits.
> I really think this fear of bulk edits has gone too far.
There is no fear, there are long-standing rules that have reasons.
tom
More information about the talk
mailing list