[OSM-talk] OSM SPAM detector

Walter Nordmann wnordmann at gmx.de
Sun Mar 11 02:01:16 UTC 2018


Hi Blake,

yes,  I messed up something. :(

saturday morning i asked my mail provider to fix that problem, but they 
didn't do anything. it's weekend :(

time to change the provider.

Regards

walter


Am 11.03.2018 um 01:33 schrieb Blake Girardot:
> Hi Walter,
>
> No, the subject of this thread about spam related to OSM changesets,
> it has nothing to do with email.
>
> Your rejection notice is because it seems OSM's email servers make use
> of a service that "block lists" other email servers that have an
> alleged reputation of sending spam. However you send your emails, they
> are being sent through a server that is on that block list and
> therefor OSM's email servers refuse to accept it or any emails that
> come from your email provider's servers.
>
> Following the link in the message you included provides more
> information: https://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/query/SBL229647
>
> Regards,
> blake
>
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 7:54 PM, Walter Nordmann <wnordmann at gmx.de> wrote:
>> is that the reason for that?
>>
>> This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
>>
>> A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of
>> its recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es)
>> failed:
>>
>> tagging at openstreetmap.org:
>> SMTP error from remote server for RCPT TO command, host:
>> a.mx.openstreetmap.org (212.110.172.32) reason: 550-Rejected because
>> 82.165.159.14 is in a black list at zen.spamhaus.org
>> 550 https://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/query/SBL229647
>>
>> could not send mails to tagging for 2 days.
>> walter
>>
>> Am 05.03.2018 um 15:06 schrieb Jason Remillard:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This weekend I put together a SPAM detector for OSM changesets.
>>
>> https://github.com/jremillard/osm-changeset-classification
>>
>> You don't need to be a developer to contribute, send over any SPAM'y
>> changesets you come across via a github issue, a pull request, or even an
>> email to me. I just need the changeset id.
>>
>> The code is currently hitting 99+% accuracy detecting the difference between
>> 1500 random normal edits and 1500 sketchy changesets that Fredrick shared
>> with the talk-us last last week. This is with zero tuning, so it looks like
>> it will work well.
>>
>> Jason
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> talk mailing list
>> talk at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> talk mailing list
>> talk at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>>
>
>




More information about the talk mailing list