[OSM-talk] Is it time to redevelop JOSM?
Jem
jem.mawson at gmail.com
Sun Oct 7 21:44:28 UTC 2018
Putting aside the string of 0-day exploits on applet plugins (which
absolutely nobody uses) that we saw a few years ago, I'm finding it
difficult to get info that backs up the claim that Java is much less secure
than .NET. What I have found indicates they are on par. e.g.
https://www.veracode.com/sites/default/files/Resources/Reports/state-of-software-security-focus-on-application-development.pdf
It feels a bit like the old "java is slow" argument, which hasn't been true
for over a decade.
On Mon, 8 Oct 2018 at 07:40, James <james2432 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Android(google) has been sued over implementing their own JVM, so they do
> not depend on Oracle(oracle lost that fight too)
>
> On Sun., Oct. 7, 2018, 5:38 p.m. Richard, <ricoz.osm at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Oct 07, 2018 at 05:11:20PM -0400, James wrote:
>> > people will switch to openjdk. problem solved.
>>
>> my hope too. Although Oracle's touch of death has left an impressive
>> trace
>> in the IT departments Java is much more than that single implementation
>> by
>> Sun/Oracle. Think Android, gcj, c-lang and a few dozens third party
>> compilers
>> and implementations, also many new languages depending on Java.
>>
>> > > iD runs using an Internet connection and a browser. I think there is
>> a
>> > > need for something like JOSM which can work completely off line if
>> need be.
>>
>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Merkaartor ?
>> Vespucci?
>>
>> Richard
>>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20181008/8c6c9286/attachment.html>
More information about the talk
mailing list