[OSM-talk] Fwd: Short ways added to substitute barriers

[Jem]

Your assumptions are spot-on. Thanks for the advice.

On Mon, 29 Oct 2018 at 20:12, Mateusz Konieczny <matkoniecz at tutanota.com>
wrote:

> 29. Oct 2018 04:08 by jem.mawson at gmail.com:
>
>
> Re: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/634085262 and several more like it
> in the area.
>
> It seems that new, short ways have been introduced to replicate the
> purpose of the existing barrier nodes. i.e. to prevent routing for
> vehicular traffic. I believe it is incorrect and just adds complexity.
>
> I plan to contact the user to discuss, but want to make sure I'm right.
> Can any experienced members please advise?
>
>
> I am assuming that there is a gate here and there is no short segment
> where
>
> motor vehicles are forbidden - though weirder thing happened and maybe
> there is a sign
>
> meters before gate from each side "motor vehicles forbidden".
>
>
> I would consider it as a tagging for renderer, and it would be preferable
> to avoid it (tagging
>
> access on gate should be sufficient). On the other hand it is one of the
> least harmful ones
>
> so I would it phrase it "it is not necessary to do that" rather "it is
> harmful, stop immediately,
>
> I reverted your edits".
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20181029/d98d1065/attachment.html>