[OSM-talk] Survey on global and local communities in OpenStreetMap
Christoph Hormann
osm at imagico.de
Thu Aug 8 10:17:42 UTC 2019
On Thursday 08 August 2019, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> > By speaking directly and publishing my responses i risk being
> > challenged and criticized personally. While i don't mind this
> > there are definitely a lot of people who don't want or can't do
> > this. And many of them probably would not mind their answers being
> > published anonymously.
>
> So essentially all you want is a fourth option in the initial
> "Permission" question that is called
>
> "Publicly, anonymized" ?
Yes, the logical choices that can be offered in a survey like this are
IMO:
* only allow publication of the statistically aggregated results (what
you usually have in an analysis of surveys, like percentages). For
free form answers this requires subjective interpretation.
* allow anonymized publication of individual answers. The anonymization
happens by disconnecting the individual answers from each other so
answers allowing the identification of a participants (like OSM user
name) cannot be connected to other answers. In addition identifying
information could also be redacted from free form answers for
publication.
* allow full publication of the raw data (which is not really necessary
to provide as an option since this participants can easily do on their
own).
* optionally to either of these allow non-public dissemination of raw
data to certain parties.
--
Christoph Hormann
http://www.imagico.de/
More information about the talk
mailing list