[OSM-talk] Attribution guideline status update

Yves yvecai at mailbox.org
Fri Aug 9 11:25:12 UTC 2019

Hi Simon,
This guideline is a great piece of work, thanks a lot to all the participants.
Inevitably, this will be too much or not enough for anybody, however I find the content reasonable and in line with what I understood from current written expectations.
A few more mockups, notably for minimaps and apps would be great.
After all the text is clear enough and I would find the "yes, but we want to let the designer some freedom" argument a bit hypocritical.

Le 9 août 2019 09:41:25 GMT+02:00, Simon Poole <simon at poole.ch> a écrit :
>As we've mentioned multiple times over the last months, the LWG decided
>last year to consolidate all attribution guidance in to one document
>address some of the use cases that have become common over the last 7
>years that previously had none. Particularly in the light of the
>parallel discussions about attribution on larger social media platforms
>we need to make up our minds what we actually want, and define concrete
>minimum requirements for acceptable attribution. To not do this just
>provides the excuse of pointing to the cacophony of voices all saying
>something different. 
>We've been working on and off on the document for a while, and are now
>largely finished. Going forward we intend to wikify the document and
>make it available for public comment together with a BoF session at
>next month (which probably means that we'll have to appropriate a
>break). You can have a glimpse at the text here
>the few things that are not nailed down belong to those that we would
>appreciate feedback on.
>PS: the number of coffee breaks permitting we might want to appropriate
>another one for the discussion of a tile licence change.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20190809/493ffee5/attachment.html>

More information about the talk mailing list