[OSM-talk] [Osmf-talk] Attribution guideline status update

[stevea]

I wouldn't be so quick to dis our wiki, Guillaume.  Personally, I find it a relatively-easy-entry system for plastic, live documentation of a project and its data, process and people.  It serves this purpose well even for less-than-tech-friendly folk and has for the life of our project.  Wikis can be encyclopedic in their scope, yes.  However, building long-term (many years) projects out of them is a proven-many-times case.  Wikis accommodate fast-moving and slow and steady growth alike.  Color-coded tables often provide at-a-glance status.  It isn't hard to copy-and-paste and build things out of things, with other people building things, too, meet-ya-in-the-wiki.

SteveA
California