[OSM-talk] [Osmf-talk] Attribution guideline status update

[Nuno Caldeira]

true, but was mentioned here on March 2019

https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2019-March/082147.html

On 29/12/2019 03:43, Kathleen Lu wrote:
> Nuno I searched your attachment for the word "Snap" and it is nowhere 
> to be found.
>
> On Tue, Dec 24, 2019 at 10:55 AM Nuno Caldeira 
> <nunocapelocaldeira at gmail.com <mailto:nunocapelocaldeira at gmail.com>> 
> wrote:
>
>     Hi Mateusz,
>
>
>     They don't. Here's all my email exchange with them from October
>     2018, yes _*2018*_. it's more than enough with evidence and time
>     to be fixed.
>     https://drive.google.com/file/d/110XubCe0kd2HNtbqXS7U_vr44xyieaSt/view?usp=sharing
>
>
>     On 24/12/2019 07:08, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
>>     Have they responded with anything
>>     (except automatic reply) ?
>>
>>     Is there an assigned issue id?
>>
>>
>>     23 Dec 2019, 21:32 by nunocapelocaldeira at gmail.com
>>     <mailto:nunocapelocaldeira at gmail.com>:
>>
>>         I sent this situation to Mapbox 10 months ago.
>>
>>         On Mon, 23 Dec 2019, 17:00 joost schouppe,
>>         <joost.schouppe at gmail.com <mailto:joost.schouppe at gmail.com>>
>>         wrote:
>>
>>
>>                 As an xmas bonus, here's another Facebook company
>>                 (via Mapbox), Snapchat that is using OSM without
>>                 attribution requirements (funnily there's plenty of
>>                 space for a reasonable and visible calculated mapbox
>>                 logo and text). They probably don't know, nor that
>>                 they have been asked to comply over a year ago, nor
>>                 have agreed with the license in every aspect of it
>>                 when stated using OSM data, nor read Mapbox TOS, or
>>                 Mapbox been informed on these repeated offenders, nor
>>                 read the multiples reports in mailing lists, nor that
>>                 they had a employee that ran for OSMF board.
>>
>>                 https://map.snapchat.com/
>>
>>                 Let's continue to be hypocrites and pretend nothing
>>                 is going on for over a year with these two companies
>>                 that are corporate members of OSMF and should be the
>>                 first ones to give examples. Enough with excuses.
>>
>>
>>             The Snapchat case is a pretty clear example of how not to
>>             do things. If there's space for Mapbox, there's space for
>>             OpenStreetMap. But I don't think Snapchat has anything to
>>             do with Facebook.
>>
>>             Phil, I hope you contacted them directly and not through
>>             Facebook.
>>
>     _______________________________________________
>     osmf-talk mailing list
>     osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org <mailto:osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org>
>     https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20191229/28faf6d3/attachment.html>