[OSM-talk] Ways divided by paint?

Philip Barnes phil at trigpoint.me.uk
Thu Jul 4 13:44:21 UTC 2019


On Thursday, 4 July 2019, Snusmumriken wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-07-04 at 13:50 +0200, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
> > I strongly disagree with this idea,
> > and multiple times changed such splits
> > back to one way.
> 
> I would consider that as an act of vandalism by removing ground truth
> information that your fellow mappers have gathered and encoded in the
> database.
>
It is only vandalism if you loose information, if you are improving the mapping by changing such misleading information to correctly mapped turn lanes then it is improving the map.

Phil (trigpoint)



 
> > 
> > 
> > Jul 4, 2019, 11:49 AM by snusmumriken.mapper at runbox.com:
> > > On Wed, 2019-07-03 at 14:03 -0600, Jack Armstrong Dancer--- via
> > > talk
> > > wrote:
> > > > I've always had the impression we should not create separate
> > > > traffic
> > > > lanes unless "traffic flows are physically separated by a barrier
> > > > (e.g., grass, concrete, steel), which prevents movements between
> > > > said
> > > > flows."
> > > 
> > > A painted line that has the legal status of "do not cross" is a
> > > perfectly fine reason to have a separate way.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>

-- 
Sent from my Sailfish device


More information about the talk mailing list