[OSM-talk] Reordering and rewriting Good Practice wiki page

Joseph Eisenberg joseph.eisenberg at gmail.com
Fri Jul 5 02:43:43 UTC 2019

Re: "Try to keep changesets to a manageable size, both in number of
changes and geographical scope."

This would be good to add to "Good changeset comments"

If a changeset covers a huge are or too many changes, it won't be easy
to understand the comments in the future.

It's not usually a problem for iD users, since you get a warning when
over 100 objects have been edited and it's hard to scroll around too
far, but it happens with JOSM and imports.

Many of the issues with too large changesets are related to imports
and mechanical edits, which are not currently discussed on this
Good_practice page but have separate pages:



On 7/5/19, Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 05/07/19 05:54, Jmapb wrote:
>> On 7/4/2019 12:40 AM, Warin wrote:
>>> On the order of things.
>>> Best to tell them what to do first. This provides some motivation.
>>> Leave 'what not to do' for last, these tend to turn people away.
>>> So I would do:
>>> 1    One feature, one OSM element
>>> 2    Good changeset comments (+Keep the history)
>>> 3    Editing Standards: (Align aerial imagery before tracing, Do not
>>> trace from outdated imagery... Keep straight ways straight ... Mark
>>> estimations with FIXME ... etc.)
>>> 4    Do correct errors
>>> 5    Verifiability (+Map what's on the ground, Don't map: historic
>>> events, temporary features, local legislation etc)
>>> 6    Document your custom-tags (Don't remove tags that you don't
>>> understand...
>>> 7    Don't map for the renderer (+ Don't misuse name tag)
>> I'd personally advocate for one more "don't" -- But it can be phrased as
>> a "do" if that helps the psychology:
>> "Try to keep changesets to a manageable size, both in number of changes
>> and geographical scope."
>> I believe this is commonly understood best practice, but it's only
>> vaguely documented.
> +1 .. and guilty of it too (in my early days).
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

More information about the talk mailing list