[OSM-talk] OpenTrailView 360 - StreetView-like application for hikers

Nick Whitelegg nick.whitelegg at solent.ac.uk
Mon Jun 10 07:53:54 UTC 2019


OK - this is now done.


Panoramas will be licensed under CC-BY 4.0 and users are required to agree to their panoramas being used as source material for OSM on signup.


Thanks,
Nick


________________________________
From: Kathleen Lu <kathleen.lu at mapbox.com>
Sent: 04 June 2019 17:15:01
To: Nick Whitelegg
Cc: Martin Koppenhoefer; Milo van der Linden; OSM Talk
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] OpenTrailView 360 - StreetView-like application for hikers

In that case, if I were you, I'd just go straight CC-BY with a OSM/ODbL compatibility waiver. (See https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/03/17/use-of-cc-by-data/ for template language)
The "sharealike" in SA refers to the sharing conditions on derivatives, not the original. The BY part refers to the attribution requirement, which should inform future users how the panos are available under the original license.

CC-BY-SA would not permit the video I described being released on CC-BY terms, for example


On Mon, Jun 3, 2019, 11:52 PM Nick Whitelegg <nick.whitelegg at solent.ac.uk<mailto:nick.whitelegg at solent.ac.uk>> wrote:

Hi,


All I really want is to ensure the panos as individual entities (i.e. not as part of another piece of work) must be attributed (to "OTV360 contributors") and must be available as individual entities under the same  permissive license as originally provided.


I am not so bothered if people then use them as part of some other piece of work which is commercial  (such as a video with a narration, as you suggested) - as long as they are attributed.


Would ODBL be the best license in this case? Or CC-by-SA?


Thanks,

Nick

________________________________
From: Kathleen Lu <kathleen.lu at mapbox.com<mailto:kathleen.lu at mapbox.com>>
Sent: 03 June 2019 18:03:50
To: Nick Whitelegg
Cc: Martin Koppenhoefer; Milo van der Linden; OSM Talk
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] OpenTrailView 360 - StreetView-like application for hikers

So to confirm what you want...
If someone wanted to use the panos in a video, stitched together with photos they took and narration about a hike, that video must be CC-BY-SA or the panos cannot be used, is that right?



On Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 4:58 AM Nick Whitelegg <nick.whitelegg at solent.ac.uk<mailto:nick.whitelegg at solent.ac.uk>> wrote:


Hello Martin,


Yes, that sounds a good idea.


So (and asking everyone) if I was to license the panos themselves under CC-SA,  but their locations, and data derived from them, as ODBL - does that sound acceptable?


Thanks,

Nick




________________________________
From: Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com<mailto:dieterdreist at gmail.com>>
Sent: 01 June 2019 08:25
To: Nick Whitelegg
Cc: Kathleen Lu; Milo van der Linden; OSM Talk
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] OpenTrailView 360 - StreetView-like application for hikers



sent from a phone

On 31. May 2019, at 22:13, Nick Whitelegg <nick.whitelegg at solent.ac.uk<mailto:nick.whitelegg at solent.ac.uk>> wrote:


Hello Kathleen and Milo,

Thanks!


No-one besides myself has uploaded anything yet, so happy to change to ODbL. The panoramas are a different dataset to OSM however, now I think about it, it could well be they are a 'derived work' as the OSM map helps users to position them - so fine with the license change.


maybe you can make use of 2 licenses, cc-by-sa for the images/panoramas and odbl for data derived from these images? ODbL is a db license and isn’t very suitable for individual photographs?

Cheers, Martin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20190610/c0af099c/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the talk mailing list