[OSM-talk] We need to have a conversation about attribution
f at zz.de
Fri Mar 1 13:57:55 UTC 2019
On Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 10:48:54AM +0100, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
> a) would require changing license again, right?
Yes - And i had the question before we relicensed - Are we going
to have a Licensing Working group which enforces the ODbL even
Probably we are now at the point where someone has to hold up
to the big reasons why we needed a relicense.
> d) what would be our options for especially stubborn ones? DMCA filed by OSMF?
Yes - Thats exactly whats needs to happen. When you slap your strict
license on something you need to be ready to enforce it - otherwise
its just a lip service. Up to now the ODbL brought changes for mappers
with the CT etc - Data consumers still do what they ever did - Consume
and sometimes attribute at will.
So please either enforce the ODbL or relicense to CC0.
Florian Lohoff f at zz.de
UTF-8 Test: The 🐈 ran after a 🐁, but the 🐁 ran away
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the talk