[OSM-talk] [Osmf-talk] Attribution guideline status update

Simon Poole simon at poole.ch
Sun Sep 8 23:03:43 UTC 2019

Am 08.09.2019 um 23:52 schrieb Christoph Hormann:
> On Sunday 08 September 2019, Clifford Snow wrote:
>> Christoph,
>> What would you recommend and how can it be implemented and tested to
>> insure compliance with the license? How does the user of OSM data
>> figure out what data is counted in the threshold for requiring full
>> attribution. Especially when the OSM usage may just be a basemap from
>> a 3rd party tile server.
> I think any substantial use of OSM data should be attributed in a way 
> that is "reasonably calculated to make any Person that uses,
> views, accesses, interacts with, or is otherwise exposed to the Produced
> Work aware that Content was obtained from" - like the license says.  No 
> exceptions.

Nobody is making any exceptions.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20190909/1ba74026/attachment.sig>

More information about the talk mailing list