[OSM-talk] [Osmf-talk] Attribution guideline status update

[Christoph Hormann]

On Monday 09 September 2019, Simon Poole wrote:
> >
> > And what happens if one of the data sources has a hard visible
> > attribution requirement without the OSMF 'attribution light'
> > liberty? As you drafted things it would be perfectly all right to
> > bury OSM attribution on the bottom of some general credits page
> > while prominently attributing some other source because this was
> > required while the OSMF settled for less.
>
> Where does the draft say that?

The shoe is on the other foot - where does the guideline draft say that 
the permission to show OSM attribution only on a separate page under 
certain conditions depends on no other data source being attributed 
more prominently?

None of your two formulation drafts shown here states anything in that 
direction:

/If OpenStreetMap data accounts for a minority (less than 50%) part of
the visible map rendering, attribution with other sources on a separate
page that is visible after user interaction is acceptable. /

/If OpenStreetMap is not the largest data provider for the visible map
rendering, attribution with other sources on a separate page that is
visible after user interaction is acceptable./

-- 
Christoph Hormann
http://www.imagico.de/